Instacart pulls plug on AI pricing experiment after customer backlash
Instacart backs down from controversial pricing scheme
In a significant policy reversal, grocery delivery giant Instacart has terminated its AI-driven dynamic pricing experiment following public outcry and government investigations. The company confirmed Monday that all customers will now see identical prices when shopping the same store simultaneously.

The algorithm that divided shoppers
The now-defunct system, powered by technology from Instacart's 2022 acquisition Eversight AI, enabled retailers to display different prices to different users for identical products. While Instacart maintained the system didn't use personal data, consumers quickly noticed troubling patterns - neighbors receiving different quotes for the same cart of groceries.
Pressure mounts from all sides
Three key forces converged to force Instacart's hand:
- Consumer advocates sounded alarms: Research from Consumer Reports and others documented concrete examples of price discrimination
- Lawmakers took action: Senator Chuck Schumer pressed the FTC to investigate whether customers were unwitting test subjects
- Regulators circled: The FTC reportedly launched a formal probe, while Instacart recently paid $60 million to settle separate deceptive practice claims
What changes - and what doesn't
Moving forward, retailers can no longer deploy Eversight's technology for personalized pricing tests. However, stores retain flexibility to adjust prices based on geographic location - meaning your urban grocery bill might still differ from suburban counterparts.
"We've heard clearly that these tests didn't meet some customers' expectations," the company acknowledged in a blog post. This rare admission suggests even tech firms recognize limits to algorithmic experimentation when fairness concerns arise.
Key Points:
- Instacart discontinues AI-powered dynamic pricing after public backlash
- System showed different prices for same products to different users
- FTC investigation and political pressure contributed to decision
- Geographic-based pricing differences will remain in effect
- $60M settlement over separate deceptive practice claims adds to scrutiny





