Opera Neon Browser Debuts with AI Assistants, Sparks User Confusion
Opera Neon Browser Debuts with AI Assistants, Sparks User Confusion
Opera has launched Neon, a groundbreaking browser featuring three AI assistants designed to streamline online tasks. Despite its ambitious vision, early adopters report mixed experiences, citing complexity and performance hiccups.
Image source note: The image is generated by AI, and the image licensing service is Midjourney
The Trio of AI Assistants
Neon’s standout feature is its trio of AI tools:
- Chat: A conversational assistant for quick queries.
- Do: An automated task handler (e.g., booking courses).
- Make: A tool creator for simple web applications.
Chat: Information Overload?
While Chat delivers detailed answers, users criticize its verbosity and occasional inaccuracies. For instance, it miscounted web comments during testing.
Do: Speed Bumps Ahead
Do promises efficiency but struggles with slow response times and inflexibility. Users cannot seamlessly switch between assistants mid-task, and errors—like incorrect bookings—add frustration.
Make: Clunky Creativity
The Make tool lets users build apps (e.g., memory games), but its interface feels unintuitive. Pre-designed "Cards" simplify interactions but offer limited customization.
Market Viability in Question
Priced at $20/month, Neon targets power users. Opera acknowledges it’s "early-stage" and seeks feedback. Yet, skeptics argue the browser prioritizes adaptation over genuine utility.
---
Key Points:
- 🌐 Neon integrates Chat, Do, and Make, but complexity alienates users.
- 💬 Chat’s responses are lengthy and occasionally inaccurate.
- ⏳ Do’s task automation lags, lacks real-time adjustments.
- 🛠️ Make’s tool creation is innovative but cumbersome.
