A heated dispute has emerged in the competitive AI education sector, with Reliable AI publicly accusing rival firm Youzy of misleading claims about its college entrance exam planning technology. The controversy centers around which company can legitimately claim industry leadership in this specialized AI application.

According to official statements from Reliable AI, Youzy has been promoting its large language model as "the first in the industry to be filed with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology" through its WeChat account and SaaS platform. Reliable AI counters that it completed regulatory filings over a year earlier, giving it stronger legal standing and precedence in the market.

Documents show Reliable AI's algorithm model received approval on February 18, 2024, while Youzy's comparable "ChatU Text Generation and Synthesis Algorithm" wasn't filed until March 12, 2025. The earlier filing date forms the basis of Reliable AI's challenge to Youzy's marketing claims.

The dispute intensified when Reliable AI highlighted that its exam planning model launched publicly on April 23, 2024, receiving media coverage and industry recognition. Company representatives argue Youzy continued promoting its "first release" status despite knowing about the earlier competing product.

"This isn't just about market positioning," explained a Reliable AI spokesperson. "When companies make false claims about regulatory compliance and product precedence, it creates confusion for students and parents relying on these services during critical academic decisions."

Legal experts suggest the allegations could involve violations of China's advertising laws if claims are proven inaccurate. Reliable AI has formally demanded Youzy retract all disputed marketing materials and issue public clarifications.

The conflict highlights growing competition in educational AI applications, particularly for China's high-stakes college entrance exams. With families increasingly turning to technology for academic planning, transparency about product capabilities and regulatory status becomes crucial.

Industry analysts observe this public dispute may signal tighter scrutiny of edtech claims moving forward. "As AI becomes more embedded in education," noted one analyst, "we're likely seeing the beginning of more rigorous standards for how these tools are marketed to vulnerable student populations."

Key Points

1. Reliable AI challenges Youzy's claims of being first to file with regulators
2. Documentation shows a 13-month gap between companies' approval dates
3. The dispute involves marketing claims about college exam planning AI models
4. Legal implications may arise from alleged false advertising
5. Conflict reflects growing competition in educational technology sector